Not really, jQuery has a big community. A lot of firms push jQuery, like Microsoft aso. That´s ok, a lot of user with less background knowledge means a lot of support. ;o) If you can´t give such support, they blame you. I think it´s ok as it is.
2010/5/26 Michal <[email protected]> > Or could it mean that more people bookmark MooTools pages rather than > searching for them? > > Michal. > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Oskar Krawczyk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's more powerfully, true. It's more complicated, true. jQuery people > are mostly folks with zero JavaScript experience, and that's simply not our > target. We want to have at least intermediate developers on our side. > > > > The Slick-enabled version of MooTools wasn't given enough publicity since > it's still a beta – hopefully there's going to be PR after the release of a > stable 1.3. > > > > On 26 May 2010, at 07:55, jiggliemon wrote: > > > >> http://www.google.com/trends?q=jquery%2C+mootools > >> > >> How can Mootools stats be dropping? It's clearly a more powerful > >> framework (or even just a framework). Wouldn't the Query heads get > >> tired of the restrictions and redundancy, and jump ship for something > >> more extensible? > >> > >> I get the merits of jQuery, I even use it every day. But on that > >> token; I'd rather be using mootools. > >> > >> Do we need to get a PR agent? > > > > >
