So, you're saying we should go back and call it *My Object Oriented Tools*instead of the current "abbreviation".
I wouldn't mind if the logo had the definition of "moo" underneath. ___ Oskar Krawczyk http://nouincolor.com On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:53 PM, TimeImp <[email protected]> wrote: > Another thing to think about is the name of the actual JS framework/ > library. > Eg: a FW/Lib named BigDoor will probably be more remembered than > something like SmallHandle because when people think door, they think > wood, timber, building, moving thing. But SmallHandle could mean a > handle for a door, a ladder or something completely unrelated. > In this way, I believe that more people are using jQuery because of > this thinking: it has the word QUERY in there, and that is often > associated by programming-illiterate people as computer code. > But mootools [as cool as it sounds] does not have this direct link to > computer programming. To a person who programs all manner of non-web- > related things, mootools, when first proposed to them, may sound far- > fetched and, in some ways, stupid and immature [the name, not the > framework/library]. > > It might even cause them to think of Cows or Milk instead of JS code > and simplifying your life. > > So theres a POV from someone who advertises mootools at the workplace > but gets funny looks until an explanation is told. >
