At 10:34 AM 8/24/2008, CK MacLeod wrote:
Interesting observations, Rich. I always enjoy getting the benefit of your experience in copyright-related issues. (BTW, on that note, would you agree with me that Ron's interpretation of First Sale is ill-founded in the case of "stolen" goods?)

Colin

I should have added pointedly:
it does not matter if an item is resold over & over after it has been stolen
stolen goods are stolen goods until a statute of limitations passes or until a rightful owner signs off

It does not matter if 100 people owned it before it was found by the rightful owner, the person it was stolen from can reclaim it at any time pursuant to local or federal laws

If owner #10 is found by the person from whom it was stolen, the owner gets to reclaim the item at no cost and buyer #10 has civil recourse against person #9 who has recourse against person #8 down to #1 who was presumably - the thief

possession of a stolen item does not constitute owning title because title to stolen items cannot be passed on by anyone but the rightful owner

Rich===========

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to