You hit it right on the nose with your last sentence. I will explain it to you in simple steps. What Sue posted is not allowed to be posted but she did it anyhow. Because she charges for certain portions of her site she told those members NOT to post it on the internet. She believed what she did was correct at the time she made the posting available. Her posting appeared and it was posted on mopo by Todd. She immediately accused Todd of hacking into her site. Holiday (an attorney) pointed out to her that this information is not to be posted period. Just because she tells someone not to post it is irrelevant. In the meantime, it turned out that one of her subscribers had forwarded the info to Todd and Todd believing it good info for mopo members posted it on mopo. When Sue accused him on mopo of hacking into her site Todd told her why she was wrong. Sue then told mopo members that she should not have posted it on her site, and took down all information from her site that is not legal to post. She admitted she was wrong in posting it in the first place. Since she was wrong, admitted it and since Todd did not hack into her site, why shouldn't she apologize to him? Now that you understand, and I am giving you advance credit for understanding without knowing if you do, you will see why attorneys make the big bucks. I'll sign off now as I need to fill out deposit slips before the bank opens Monday and it is already Sunday afternoon. I don't know if I can fill them all out in time for the 9 am opening., CJL In a message dated 5/2/2010 2:50:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jimepisa...@comcast.net writes:
Let me see Sue (and Ed) purchased transcripts after agreeing to post them on their MEMBERS ONLY site and NOT on a public site. Someone steals them and posts them to a public site and you say Sue and Ed should apologize ? I guess that’s why attorneys make the big bucks cause I for sure do not understand that logic. Jim Check out our shop video _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-n2AznLA8o_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-n2AznLA8o) _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCP7PaO-2tk&feature=related_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCP7PaO-2tk&feature=related) _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fojAZcbvL7E&feature=related_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fojAZcbvL7E&feature=related) jim episale Unshredded Nostalgia 323 South main St. Route 9 Barnegat, N.J. 08005 800-872-9990 609-660-2626 http://www.unshreddednostalgia.com "Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional." From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Claude Litton Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:43 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] Deposition transcripts Susan Since you admitted it was your fault don't you think you owe Todd an apology for your false accusation. You jumped down his throat immediately when you should not have posted it in the first place. You accused him of hacking into your site which was blatantly false and without evidence of him doing anything wrong. Claude In a message dated 5/1/2010 11:23:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, s...@learnaboutmovieposters.com writes: Holiday, Because this lawsuit has such a negative impact on our hobby, we were trying to keep our members apprised of what was going on. But you are absolutely right -- I should have never posted it. We thought that our members (who are the only ones with access) read and understood the guidelines that state plainly and clearly that this information is not to be copied or distributed in any fashion. When a member signs in, we have a warning at the top of the page which states: "All material in this section is copyrighted and cannot be used or distributed in any form without the permission of LAMP." Unfortunately, one of our members apparently can't read or understand or simply did not care that they put us in a rather precarious situation. THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. As of tonight, all legal documents have been removed from LAMP and we will no longer be providing any legal updates. Let someone else do it. I worked in a law firm in New Orleans for 20 years and still have access to legal services but as I stated I am obligated to use them in a certain fashion. I have tried to meet that obligation but obviously I didn't do as good as I thought. Again, thank you. Susan LearnAboutMoviePosters.com -----Original Message----- From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Holiday Russell Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 10:08 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: [MOPO] Deposition transcripts I'm not speaking to the issue about how the transcript was picked up off of LAMP, I have no information about that. I'm only referring to the statement that a deposition transcript is a public record subject to FOIA. Typically, this is not true. Most deposition transcripts are not part of the public record. Typically, they are only made a part of the record if there is a particular purpose for filing them with the court. Typically, the are used ultimately for impeachment purposes at trial if a witness contradicts his earlier testimony. Moreover, when filing transcripts if the need arises, there are redaction rules that govern the attorneys who are filing the transcript. Additionally, most attorneys are sensitive to filing a witness's financial information in a public proceeding and will thus ask that the court either seal the transcript or enter a confidentiality order which prevents access absent limited circumstances. I would say that whoever it was that released the transcript to begin with was amiss and somewhat cavalier in doing so. I respect Sue's attempt to keep it confidential within the confines of LAMP, but frankly, it should not even have gotten that far. Of course, I'm sure there are facts out there which may have warranted deviation from the typical scenarios, and I hope that someone along the lines of this discussion helps clarify the circumstances under which the transcript was released so that we can all consider it in its appropriate context. Holiday Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
