Exactly, Kirby, third party insurance is the only way when using FedEx.
They have a real self serving deal going by offering insurance on items they 
will NOT insure and selling it all the time to the unsuspecting.
I understand Sean made them see it differently on at least one occasion, if I 
heard correctly, and think that's great. 
How many thousands of people will not protest once the diamond ring is lost and 
they have insured it with FedEx thinking all is well?
USPO offers Registered mail which is a very secure method as far as I'm 
concerned. It just takes the snail mail time frame, but you can insure up to 
hundreds of thousands of dollars.


-----Original Message-----
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Kirby 
McDaniel
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 5:11 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Another fleabay Moron

Absolutely.  You have explained it better than I have.

I have never been able to discern WHY they have this policy --- and NO ONE at 
Fed Ex -- and I have talked
to some folks very high up the food chain -- has been able to explain it to me.

Why they care what it is you are sending (as far as valuation goes) is beyond 
me.  The fee for upper levels of declared value 
act just like an insurance premium from what I can see.  So why it makes a 
difference what is being shipped -- I'm not smart
enough to figure that out.

I think they fear the inside job.

One can get good third party insurance for Fed EX shipments, and policy holders 
with Collectibles Insurance can
insure through them - it comes with the policy.

Kirby


On Dec 12, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Sean Linkenback wrote:

> You nailed it with FedEx Kirby.
> If you file a claim with them, they are very quick to point out that they do 
> not offer "insurance" at all (and they point to their service manual, which 
> they never give you a copy of or have available to back them up).
> 
> They simply have a "declared value" section where they charge you an 
> additional fee to transport packages that are worth more than $100.00
> 
> Of course this doesn't stop their clerks from asking if you would like to 
> purchase "insurance" for your package.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirby McDaniel [mailto:ki...@movieart.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 05:29 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Another fleabay Moron
> 
> David, et al
> If a small tax were levied on email and text messages -- and it wouldn't have 
> to be very large either - the revenues
> could be used to support snail mail 6 days a week for everybody. And it would 
> help to control spam and frivolous email
> as well. 
> 
> 
> When J Crew, L.L. Bean, Williams-Sonoma, Lands End and all these other good 
> folks have to hand off that catalog
> delivery business to UPS, then we'll hear a caterwauling for sure.
> 
> 
> Personally, I really dislike UPS. Here in Austin they simply will leave a 12 
> thousand dollar package on your porch whether
> a signature is required or not. Either they just don't care or their drivers 
> are intentionally ignoring it. 
> 
> 
> FED EX is, of course, quite good where speed is necessary. But the insurance 
> things with them is not applicable to film posters. I've posted
> about this in the past. If you "insure" a film poster with FED EX and it gets 
> lost, they are not required to pay you. Because works of art, 
> collectibles, jewelry and furs are distinctly excepted from liability in 
> their service manual. 
> 
> 
> Kirby
> www.movieart.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 12, 2011, at 3:20 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:
> 
> I'm a moderate conservative who swings left socially and right fiscally - yet 
> I agree completely with what Kirby, Franc, Rich and others have said about 
> how critical it is to preserve our beleaguered USPS. Free markets cannot 
> apply to a service that by law, goes EVERYWHERE. Most people don't know the 
> post office gets its revenue almost ENTIRELY through the sale of postage, NOT 
> tax dollars. If the post office raised its first class rate for a one-ounce 
> letter to $1, I would still pay it. The idea that strangers in USPS uniforms 
> will carry a letter for you for less than 50 cents - and deliver it to a 
> rural location with a high degree of reliability - is amazing to me. 
> 
> I'm also a sucker for the "neither rain, nor sleet nor snow," slogan long 
> associated with the USPS. That's what the USPS is all about. I've been all 
> over the world and in terms of reliability of delivery, we've got one of the 
> best postal systems anywhere. This is corny but what Franc wrote about the 
> USPS as part of our nation's heritage rings true for me. I try my best to 
> greet my postal carrier every day. Just last week, in the black of night, a 
> different carrier, a younger woman, came to my door carrying a large box on 
> her shoulder. She had one of those those beamed LED lights attached to the 
> front of her cap so she wouldn't fall. She was late but determined to get 
> through that day's deliveries that had turned quickly into night. I assessed 
> her situation in a few seconds and was in awe. And the next day she no doubt 
> went through the same thing all over again, elsewhere.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:31:22 -0800
> From:sa...@comic-art.com
> Subject: Re: Another fleabay Moron
> To:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> 
> Kirby is so right about this:
> 
> 
> At 08:49 AM 12/12/2011, Kirby McDaniel wrote:
> 
> * Don't get me started on this. The postal services are NOT a business. They 
> were never intended to be a business. They are a government service. We still 
> need them, despite
> what some who worship the "free" markets think.Visit the MoPo Mailing List 
> Web Site 
> atwww.filmfan.com___________________________________________________________________How
>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed 
> to:listserv@listserv.american.eduIn the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF 
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site 
> atwww.filmfan.com___________________________________________________________________How
>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed 
> to:listserv@listserv.american.eduIn the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF 
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at 
> www.filmfan.com___________________________________________________________________How
>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing ListSend a message addressed to: 
> listserv@listserv.american.eduIn the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF 
> MOPO-LThe author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
>         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___________________________________________________________________
>              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> 
>       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> 
>    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to