as we all know what happened at some point was internet spreading all over 
.before that there were lesser sellers who artificially kept all prices high 
with stores and catalogues/auctions only sales .i think for collectors this has 
been an amazing evolution to grow their collections , as for sellers it's 
simple , the quality items that rarely turn up keep their value (or keep rising 
in value) all the rest has gone down to more reasonable/logical prices with a 
blown up monopoly .so i personally , though being a seller , would say that as 
for negative worth on a moral , not a financial  level one might question more 
why in the past all this was so expensive and can now be found so much cheaper 
...does a collector struggle with the question : it's now cheaper so  the value 
of my collection has gone down ( he will if he only buys and collects as an 
investment) or with the question , hey didn't i get badly ripped off in the 
past by some greedy bastards ?
filip

Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:43:49 -0500
From: ki...@movieart.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I agree with Rich entirely here.  We all resent rising prices, but Heritage is 
just one of millions of business experiecing rising costs.
Kirby McDanielwww.movieart.com

On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:37 PM, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art 
<sa...@comic-art.com> wrote:

I largely agree with Ira and disagree with Simon in some ways


for the most part, I win very little under $100, and so the $19 min bp
means nothing as I'm already paying 19.5%


if you only bid in the signature auctions, then the $19 min has no effect
as nothing sells under $100 in those, so you're only talking about Sunday
auctions and in case people don't pay attention, the average item price
in an HA sale is $70-100 on a weekly basis (last week they did just short
of $41k on 496 listings est $82 per item, with bp).


it has at best, a small effect


what about those sellers who drive down prices by selling massive amount
of posters for $20 and less, including silent & golden age material
that previously sold for much higher prices? Aren't they a negative worth
discussing? Don't they have a greater effect on collectors, devaluing
their collections in real time? 


Nobody forces anyone to do business with any specific entity. You can
choose who you spend money with, just like I do. (this is part of the
capiltalist/consumerist theory)

If HA has something you want this week, I seriously doubt the extra $5
has much of a curtailing aspect to it


Rich




At 08:29 AM 6/16/2016, Ira Rubenstein wrote:

I guess I come at this from a
collector view.   And I have never sold anything that I have
bought before.   So I am probably a little naïve about it
all.    And if I was selling a lot of items, then of
course I would want a maximum of options to sell
through.    


To me the relationship between auction houses and dealers is
symbiotic.  They both need each other.    Dealers bid
on auction items all the time in an effort to find something to
resell.   This helps maintain a floor on pricing. I am sure
dealers sell through auctions at times well when they need to liquidate
or manage inventory.      And I don’t think this
is exclusive to Movie Posters.   (Books, Coins, Stamps,
Baseball cards, Art, etc…)    All areas of collections
have dealers and auction houses.     



 From a collectors stand point I have relationships with many dealers
both in Movie Posters and Animation art.   One animation art
dealer has done an exceptional job of always calling me when he finds
something he knows I will be interested in.    Many others
don’t.     But as a collector it is also fun to
participate in Auctions because there is always one item you are looking
for.  Comes up from time to time.  You lose out a few times and
then you win.   And the fun is to finally win.   And
at a price you can afford.   Or you realize you have to save
more to get what you want.     OR you see a poster
you have never seen before and you decide it looks amazing and you want
to hang it on your wall.   That’s the fun of
discovery.   


So to me,  having healthy auction houses and healthy dealers is best
for everyone.   I don’t think one can survive without the
other.   And I don’t think it is a win/lose
situation.     


I can’t speak to people leaving the hobby or staying in it.   I
would think a lot of it is age of the typical collecting consumer and
what type of films they grew up with.    I am amazed at
what 80’s film posters are selling for when I know there are tens of
thousands of copies of each one.    (Having worked in the
film marketing world)      To me,  these
are the films of their youth and that’s what they want to hang on their
wall.    It can also be that as people get older they look
at getting rid of things,  smaller homes,   wanting the
money to do other things as they live in retirement.   



 I can also see for myself in the next 10 to 15 years as I
downsize,  I will probably be forced to look hard at starting to
sell my collection.    And figuring out the best way to do
that.  Who knows,  it may be my retirement career,  
joining all of you in the dealer world.  :)    



Personally, as a collector/consumer I do like Heritage and I like Bruce
at emovieposter.     The auctions are well
run.   Accurate descriptions.  Pictures.  Billing and
packing are easy.  A lot done digitally.   Heritage Live
on a mobile platform is very impressive
tech.      In my area of work,  I am always
reminding people to focus on the consumer and both of them have done
that.   Very well.    And if you focus on the
consumer first,  you will always win.    (Steve Jobs
lesson)  


Thank you all for your thoughts.  I enjoy these type of discussions
as I learn more about the hobby and the business of
posters.    


Best,


Ira





   


From: MoPo List
<
mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Simon Oram
<
fab5fre...@btinternet.com>

Reply-To: Simon Oram
<
fab5fre...@btinternet.com>

Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:41 AM

To:
"
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU"
<
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>

Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges


Yes I think Wim pointed out by what you wrote Ira..”dominant” by
definition that means, control or power over others and when that happens
a market becomes stale and unexciting, the business of collecting and
dealing did seem all more exciting a few years back. 

 

It also seems to me that allot of people who had taken up collecting
around the millennium mark are, dropping like flies out of the market
place, selling up and moving on from it. I can only write what I have
been told but, I have been asking. Heritage promises the world to it’s
consignors and they expect to get it, it’s a possibility that people only
trust them with it.

 

Simon 

From: Wim Jansen 

Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:09 PM

To:

MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 

Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

 

I would say as a animation
collector too,  I was very impressed with their recent animation
auction.   They have quickly become the dominant auction house
for animation art.    

There’s your answer, coming into the market, flooding it with volume and
eliminate the original expert dealers without needing the expertise. Then
after that you raise your percentages. 

I have bought quite a few posters with Heritage and i do trust and value
Grey as a straight business guy and a very knowledgable expert, but I
always have niggles in the deal after the purchase. In those events I
have had contact with a lot of people. It seems like the entire back
office consists of temps, there’s a huge turnover of personnel. That does
not feel good.

 

Wim

Op 16 jun. 2016, om 15:27 heeft Ira Rubenstein
<irubenst...@pbs.org> het
volgende geschreven:


I think you will see that
through this move,   Heritage will eliminate people listing
lower priced items.     As a business if they can
focus on higher ticket items there is a higher return per
item.    There is a fixed labor cost per item you
list,  and as a business obviously you want to maximize your return
per item.          

 

I am not saying the increase on a min charge is right or wrong.  To
me it is just a business decision.      I would
say as a animation collector too,  I was very impressed with their
recent animation auction.   They have quickly become the
dominant auction house for animation art.   

 

I am curious to the last statement about how the Film Poster Business has
lost a lot because of Heritage and their patrons.    
I am a collector and not a dealer.    How has Heritage
hurt the business?   Is that a overall Dealer
perspective?   

 

I would also agree with the other statement that there are lots of other
venues and in a free trade society,  if something gets out of whack,
there will always be something new to balance it.   

 

Anyway,  my .02.   

 

Ira

From: MoPo List
<
mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Simon Oram
<
fab5fre...@btinternet.com>

Reply-To:
"
fab5fre...@btinternet.com"
<
fab5fre...@btinternet.com>

Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:41 AM

To:
"
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU"
<
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>

Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

 

Agree..I think it was good to start with now, it seems the film poster
business has lost allot because of them? and their patrons.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: Michael Greenwood

Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2016 12:23

To:

MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Reply To: Michael Greenwood

Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges

 

I'm sure they justified it to their shareholders in the normal
way...growth must come at a cost...to the users.  And I imagine they
were pleased with this news.  The non-stop greed in this world is
really intense these days!  Thankfully this hobby has other venues
and less grabby sellers.

 

M





From: MoPo List
<
mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Tommy Barr
<tommymb...@gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:21 AM

To:

MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Subject: [MOPO] Heritage charges 

 

Just noticed that from this weekend Heritage Auctions is charging a
minimum buyer's commission of $19, an increase of 36%. I just wonder how
they justify that? 

 

Tommy



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1


 



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
 



To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the
following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the
following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1






To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the
following link:


https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
 




To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1





To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
                                          
         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to