> and how can pirsig claim to philosophize > in an original and creative way, > considering heidegger accomplished what merely pirsig tried to, > only earlier, more comprehensively, and downright better? I would be interested if you could elaborate on what you consider Heidegger's achievement to be in that regard, and what the similarities to Pirsig are. I would also be very grateful if we could confine ourselves to the confines of prose to do so :-) MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re: MD Language and reality elephant
- Re: MD Language and reality Marco
- RE: MD Language and reality Chris Lofting
- Re: MD Language and reality Andrea Sosio
- MD Heidegger Kevin Sanchez
- Re: MD Heidegger elephant
- Re: MD Heidegger Kevin Sanchez
- Re: MD Heidegger 3dwavedave
- Re: MD Heidegger Kevin Sanchez
- RE: MD Heidegger Richard Ridge
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas Richard Ridge
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas elephant
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas Marco
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas elephant
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas Marco
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas elephant
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas Marco
- Re: MD Some sparse (trivial?) ideas (I DONT... elephant
- MD Inside and Outside Marco
- Re: MD Inside and Outside elephant
- Re: MD Inside and Outside Marco