Elephant,
> As we walk along the road, care to comment on my throwaway line that
you
> overlooked? The one about maps:
>
> > MARCO WROTE:
> >> I agree with Roger about the warning in the bottom of the map. But
I
> >> would like to discuss the map, here: actually, maps are the only
things
> >> we can discuss about.
> >
> > ELEPHANT:
> > Well a fat lot of use maps would be if that remark were true.
>
> I mean to say: maps themselves are "about" something, they too
"discuss",
> and if maps themselves were only discussions about maps then they'd be
very
> little use for getting to Rome.
>
Well, that "we" was mainly to indicate me and you.... as we can't agree
on the land, I'm asking for a discussion about the Pirsig's map.
Anyway, the map/land distinction is another false problem. As you know,
IMO maps are part of the land.....
> All roads lead to Rome, so we probably won't go wrong there.
>
> But do all roads lead to the truth?
>
> I think not.
>
All roads are true.
Marco.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
