Duckman, I mean ... drose, I'm curious as to how exactly the ethical requirement quacks like God in the "Something rather than nothing" genre of philosophical questions. Here's the deal (pretend that I know): You said that God is analogous to DQ. How exactly, or rather, in what sense are you using analogous? 'Cuz, You then said that, >Ethical cause = DQ = God. The problem that I see arising from those that find it unpleasing to have God snuck back into metaphysics is that God, typically, entails more than just ethical cause. Here, in fact, would be the rebuttal: Ethical requirement (cause, whatever; I think we can agree that they stand for the same thing) equals DQ because they both stand for Good (that's right, with a capital G). God, however, stands for a whole bucket-load more of duck: Omnibenevolence (that's the Good part) Omnipotence Omniscience Omnipresence Those are just some of the kinds of duck that get thrown into the God-bucket. Any particular believer may think differently. There may be more, there may be less. But I would argue (and here's where I argue) that the ethical requirement (as I understand it) only needs the "Good part". It gets equated to DQ (but is not the whole of DQ) because the "Good part" is contained within DQ. Of course, that's not all DQ is. It's also the "pre-intellectual cutting edge of experience". And this does mean that the ethical requirement can be equated to God for the same reason. But I don't think DQ can be equated to God (or vice versa) because not all of the parts of either is contained in the other (in simpler terms, not all of DQ can be fit in God without leaving something behind and vice versa). UNLESS, 1. You believe that the only duck in the bucket is Omnibenevolence. That you would be willing to say that God fits in DQ, but not vice versa (just as the ethical requirement fits in DQ, but not vice versa). or, 2. You are a Spinozist and believe that DQ is just one part of God. I have to assume you would then argue that God = Quality. Which is probably the best thing to do and makes the clearest sense. The reason for my renewed vigor in playing the game (see my last post) is because of my fascination with Spinoza and God. I've written an essay on Spinoza, showing why he did not prove the existence of God (granting that such a thing could be done), and currently he's making a surprise appearence in an essay I'm writting/modifying for the Forum. Though I was in the midst of disproving his proof, at the same time as I wrote that essay I was thinking, "Ya' know, if Spinoza just made God "Quality" his proof would work." Since then I've always thought that Pirsig was a kind of Spinozist (just as he's "a kind" of everything else), just without the God part. And I always figured it would be fairly easy to convert the MOQ into Spinozism, if one were so inclined. So far, I haven't been so inclined and this is the first time that I've actually written those musings out. Maybe I should write that essay.... Something for another time, I guess. Oh, wait. There was an arguement going on here. Hrm, why don't I wrap it up. 2 parts: Explain what exactly "DQ is analgous to God" means. and then, Explain what God actually means (i.e. which ducks are in the bucket) to, let's say, you and how that makes it analogous to Dynamic Quality. Or do it for the Catholic Church, though I think you would have less of a leg to stand on (or maybe not, who knows). Or just do the last part. It's the meatier one and probably includes the first part. Oh, and hey, anyone can do this. I want to hear everyone who believes in God to chime in on this one. In large part because God means something different for everyone and I don't want drose to speak on behalf of everyone. Loving the ducks and all the quacking, Matt MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
Re: MD Dynamic Quality and God
Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:27:46 -0700
- Re: MD md death penalty Simon Knight
- Re: MD md death penalty Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- MD Summary of the MOQ Platt Holden
- MD Migration towards Dynamic Quali... Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... 3dwavedave
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Elizaphanian
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Andrea Sosio
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Platt Holden
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... drose
- Re: MD Dynamic Quality and God Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD Dynamic Quality and God drose
- Re: MD Dynamic Quality and God Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Platt Holden
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... drose
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... John Beasley
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Simon Knight
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Platt Holden
- Re: MD Migration towards Dynamic Q... Jonathan B. Marder