1.      Point 40 is ok to use as a fixed point if you can assert it is at a 
biologically homologous position. I would tend to doubt it.  I am not a fan of 
using a comb fan – perhaps ok but arbitrary especially if one uses sliding 
semilandmarks.
2.      See above.
3.      I would think so but I am no expert on larval development.
4.      The location of the eye should be a good landmark. Perhaps the only 
type I you have? Yes, it will likely interact with head shape. I can imagine 
the shape may vary depending on the eye location. That might be interesting.

 

____________________________________________

F. James Rohlf, Distinguished Professor, Emeritus. Ecology & Evolution

Research Professor, Anthropology

Stony Brook University

 

From: Avi Koplovich [mailto:netbird.porta...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 10:31 AM
To: MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
Cc: netbird.porta...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [MORPHMET] Digitizing landmarks on live larvae

 

Hi James,
Thank you for your fast answer.
I'll continue to mark the landmarks as separated sublets, i.e. head and tail.

1.      Is it ok to use landmark 40 (intersection of the side line and the 
dorsal connection of the tail fin) as a common mark point to create a comb fan 
for both tail and head?
2.      Another question: Is this landmark 40 can be treated as fixed landmark 
as it is restricted by both x and y axis?
3.      Can I use landmarks 20 (tail tip) and 48 (head tip) as fixed landmarks 
in an ontogenetic experiment?
4.      Last question: Can/Should I use the eye as a fixed landmark for the 
head (i.e. can it interfere with interpreting the head contour)?

p.s. I saw your forum message here on updating tpsdig 2.31 and already updated 
it.

 

Many thanks,

Avi



On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:51:39 PM UTC+2, f.james.rohlf wrote:

Bending of long slender organisms (or other structures) can be an important 
practical problem. Changes due to bending could dominate the results. 
Separating sets of landmarks into more rigid sublets can help as long as the 
endpoints of the subsets are homologous and not arbitrary or dependent on the 
bending of a particular specimen. The tpsUtil program has an "unending" option 
if one has a subset of points that one knows should be in a straight line. That 
would be difficult for larvae. 

Note: I see you are using ver. 2.30 of tpsDig. Version 2.31 is current. I do 
try to keep fixing bugs so It can be useful to stay current. 

____________________________________________ 
F. James Rohlf, Distinguished Professor, Emeritus. Ecology & Evolution 
Research Professor, Anthropology 
Stony Brook University 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Avi Koplovich [mailto:netbird....@gmail.com <javascript:> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 3:09 AM 
To: MORPHMET <morp...@morphometrics.org <javascript:> > 
Subject: [MORPHMET] Digitizing landmarks on live larvae 

Hi, 
I've started a new project and came to the point of marking fixed and semi 
landmarks. 
Not all pictures are satisfying, mostly because of the posture of the larvae 
during photographing (sometimes raising it's tail). So in order to reduce the 
noise by the animal posture, I thought it would be helpful to separate head and 
tail as was done in Levis et. al. 2016, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 
I'm using the landmarks 1, 20 and 48 as fixed landmarks, and all the rest are 
semi landmarks. I'm not sure of using 20 and 48 as fixed landmarks, and I 
wonder if I can use landmark 40 as fixed landmark since it is restricted by 
both x (side line) and y (dorsal connection of the tail fin). Can/Should I use 
the eye as a fixed landmark for the head (i.e. can it interfere with 
interpreting the head contour)? 
Here is an example to show what I mean: 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iO7lCN3ZCtV7DF9vsczkb_EYoSli1Orr/view?usp=sharing
 
I'll be happy if you can advise on that. 
Thank you, 
Avi 

-- 
MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org 
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MORPHMET" group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to morphmet+u...@morphometrics.org <javascript:> . 

-- 
MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MORPHMET" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org 
<mailto:morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org> .

-- 
MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MORPHMET" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.

Reply via email to