Thank you for your help. I tested compact table on iPhone. however memory usage, loading time and translation time is similar with binary phrase table.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > take a look at the charts in > http://www.statmt.org/mtm12/pub/marcin-mtm2012.pdf > > If you still have questions, drop me an e-mail. > Best, > Marcin > > W dniu 06.03.2013 11:20, myounggun jang pisze: > > Hello > > I found that compact phrase table is 6 to 7 times smaller than binary > > phrase table. > > I am interested about memory usage, loading time, translation time. > > Data size is also important, however memory usage and time is more > > important to me. > > Can I get a data about comparison between two table? > > Thank you. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Moses-support mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
