Maybe it's time for a mini-moses fork. Instead of incorporating 
everything throw everything out that's not necessary to produce a 
translation :)

W dniu 03.04.2013 13:34, Hieu Hoang pisze:
> it is impressive, and it would make sense. Decoding would be simple 
> without non-local features like LMs.
>
> And on my tablet, it's using 30MB RAM. Moses would be hard pushed to 
> use 300MB
>
>
> On 3 April 2013 12:23, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Still impressive in my opinion. I wonder whether they actually have an
>     LM. Maybe they just intersected it with the phrase table and put some
>     more weights in the table.
>
>     W dniu 03.04.2013 13:17, Hieu Hoang pisze:
>     > The offline version seems to have multi-word phrases, but a bad
>     LM, eg:
>     >   source (vietnamese): xe hoi
>     >   online & offline: car
>     >
>     >   source: brown fish
>     >   online: poisson brun
>     > offline: brun poissons
>     >
>     >   source: do you have the time
>     >   online: avez-vous le temps
>     > offline: *ne* vous avez le temp
>     >
>     > source: where is the nearest toilet please
>     >   online: où est le plus proche toilettes s'il vous plaît
>     >   offline: où est le plus proche *de* toilettes *veuillez*
>     >
>     > Still, it's good people are finally focusing on small devices. Maybe
>     > you'll get a call from Google...
>     >
>     > On 29 March 2013 17:43, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt
>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Something very recent on the topic:
>     >
>     >
>     
> http://howto.cnet.com/8301-11310_39-57576627-285/use-google-translate-offline-by-downloading-language-packs/
>     >
>     >     I am impressed, about 150 MB per language pack. The
>     translation is
>     >     soso,
>     >     compared to the online version, but usable.
>     >
>     >     W dniu 07.03.2013 08:35, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt pisze:
>     >     > Memory usage is usually reported to be about the same (nearly
>     >     nothing
>     >     > for both phrase tables), but as Kenneth mentioned there is
>     a hidden
>     >     > usage for both phrase tables that manifests in the disk cache.
>     >     In theory
>     >     > if you run moses long enough with many many sentences the
>     old phrase
>     >     > table may eventually end up in memory completely (provided you
>     >     have so
>     >     > much memory). The same is true for the compact phrase
>     table. But
>     >     since
>     >     > the compact phrase table is 6-7 times smaller it will use 6-7
>     >     times less
>     >     > memory in an asymptotic scenario. So in theory, if the
>     small phrase
>     >     > tables fits in your RAM and old phrase table does not
>     (which is
>     >     quite
>     >     > likely so), the compact one should be always much faster after
>     >     some time
>     >     > of continuous employment.
>     >     >
>     >     > Concerning your other question about the crash. You built
>     the phrase
>     >     > table on another system, right? So the problem is that in the
>     >     trunk the
>     >     > binary formats are not compatible between 32 and 64 bit
>     systems.
>     >      I have
>     >     > versions of the phrase table and the reordering model that are
>     >     binary
>     >     > compatible between 32 and 64 bit systems, but I haven't
>     put this
>     >     into
>     >     > the trunk. It is only available in the WIPO branch which
>     in turn
>     >     is a
>     >     > lot behind the current moses development. Frankly, right now I
>     >     do not
>     >     > have much time available to make that work in the main moses
>     >     > distribution, but I can take a look. However I cannot promise
>     >     anything.
>     >     >
>     >     > W dniu 07.03.2013 07:38, myounggun jang pisze:
>     >     >> We use instruments tools in xcode. we check the
>     allocation memory.
>     >     >> I don't know disk cached is excluded.
>     >     >> I translate new sentences while measuring.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Kenneth Heafield
>     >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>     >     >>
>     >     >>      How did you measure memory usage?  I'm guessing it
>     >     excludes the disk
>     >     >>      cache that the binary phrase table functionally depends
>     >     on.  Also,
>     >     >>      were
>     >     >>      you translating new sentences while measuring or
>     >     previously translated
>     >     >>      sentences?
>     >     >>
>     >     >>      On 03/07/13 00:47, myounggun jang wrote:
>     >     >>      > Thank you for your help.
>     >     >>      > I tested compact table on iPhone.
>     >     >>      > however memory usage, loading time and translation
>     time is
>     >     >>      similar with
>     >     >>      > binary phrase table.
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt
>     >     >>      > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >>      <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote:
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      >     Hi,
>     >     >>      >     take a look at the charts in
>     >     >>      > http://www.statmt.org/mtm12/pub/marcin-mtm2012.pdf
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      >     If you still have questions, drop me an e-mail.
>     >     >>      >     Best,
>     >     >>      >     Marcin
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      >     W dniu 06.03.2013 11:20, myounggun jang pisze:
>     >     >>      >      > Hello
>     >     >>      >      > I found that compact phrase table is 6 to 7
>     times
>     >     smaller
>     >     >>      than binary
>     >     >>      >      > phrase table.
>     >     >>      >      > I am interested about memory usage, loading
>     time,
>     >     >>      translation time.
>     >     >>      >      > Data size is also important, however memory
>     usage and
>     >     >>      time is more
>     >     >>      >      > important to me.
>     >     >>      >      > Can I get a data about comparison between
>     two table?
>     >     >>      >      > Thank you.
>     >     >>      >      >
>     >     >>      >      >
>     >     >>      >      > _______________________________________________
>     >     >>      >      > Moses-support mailing list
>     >     >>      >      > [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >>      <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
>     >     >>      >      >
>     http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      > _______________________________________________
>     >     >>      >     Moses-support mailing list
>     >     >>      > [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >>      <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
>     >     >>      > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>      > _______________________________________________
>     >     >>      > Moses-support mailing list
>     >     >>      > [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >>      > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >     >>      >
>     >     >>  _______________________________________________
>     >     >>      Moses-support mailing list
>     >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> _______________________________________________
>     >     >> Moses-support mailing list
>     >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Moses-support mailing list
>     >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Moses-support mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Hieu Hoang
>     > Research Associate
>     > University of Edinburgh
>     > http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Moses-support mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Hieu Hoang
> Research Associate
> University of Edinburgh
> http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu
>

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to