Matthias Huck <mhuck@...> writes:

> 
> Hi Erinç,
> 
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:24 +0000, Matthias Huck wrote:
> > I'd assume that your 32 entries of the n-best list weren't actually
> > unique, though, but a number of duplicates of the (two) very same
> > outputs, as "distinct" should simply avoid duplicate entries.
> 
> Actually, could you please check for us whether I'm right with this
> assumption? If I'm not, then some other modification since version 2.1
> might affect your experiment. I hope that's not the case.
> 
> Run something like
>       cut -d'|' -f4 | sort | uniq | wc -l
> on the n-best list with 32 entries. It should print 2.
> 
> Or did you do this already? (You're mentioning "unique hypotheses" in
> your mail.)
> 
> Ck����̰(��5��ѡ���(��((()Q����́��������ȁ���ȁ�ե������ݕ�̸()e�̰��ȁ����ȁ�ɔ�ѡ����չ�́��ѕȀ�ͽ�Ё��չ�ā��݌������Q���ѽх���յ���)�������ѡ�͕́ɕ��ɹ�����ȁ��Ѡ���͕́݅̀���()$�ɕ��ٕ��ѡ������ѥ��Љ́�ɽ����䁱��������䁽��)͍ɥ��̽�Ʌ���������е��͕̹��������̀���ā�������̤������ѡ�Ёͽ�ٕ��ѡ�)�ɽ������9�܁$�������Ѐ�ȁչ��Ք�����ѡ�͕́ݥѠ��̸���ѽ��()%�����а�$�����ɕ������ɔ�$�݅́�����Ѽ���Ѐ���չ��Ք�����ѡ�͕̀���Ё����(������Ё���Ф�ݥѠ�ѡ��ͅ����������Ʌѥ�����������ٕ�ͥ�����ก$������ѡ�)��܀������е���ѽȁݥ������ѡ���ɥ���()
>    ��а()

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
Moses-support@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to