Whether or not you get a copy of the email you send to the list is an option you can select. The listserv software can do either. I'm guessing you can manage that and various other aspects of the listserv through the web interface or by sending commands to the list's machine address.
Maybe one of the list owners could explain how to change these things for this list. Joe On 4/2/12, Sandy Aubol <egf_baseb...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I can count on one hand the number of times I have posted a sighting. I > don't post about all the HOSP and HOFI in my yard because I doubt anyone > wants to constantly read about that, I know I don't. I try to keep my posts > to something of some sort of significance. I find that probably 95% or more > of the posts on MOU come from the eastern part of the state, Duluth, the > Cities, etc. and I live in the western-most part of the state. There is > almost nothing posted regarding my side of the state, I wish there was more! > I have to wait until the weekly report comes out to find out about anything > over here, and usually it is too late to go find it by then. > > I am torn between using Ebird and listing my findings on MOU. Both have good > benefits, but it is a lot of work to list on both. This past winter I listed > on both, which wasn't bad as there are a lot less birds to list in winter > than say in spring! I find if I list on MOU, then Ebird is lacking the > information forever. If I list on Ebird, MOU is lacking current data, until > the end of the season when things are pulled in from Ebird for the seasonal > report. Ultimately I suspect Ebird may be the place to do it since > eventually data will get to MOU. It's a toss-up! > > Sandy Aubol > Western Polk County > > > ________________________________ > From: Al Schirmacher <alschirmac...@live.com> > To: MOU-NET@LISTS.UMN.EDU > Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 7:59 AM > Subject: [mou-net] Inquiry (no sightings) > > I subscribe both to MOU & Wisbirdn (former birding home, prior to 2004). > > I wonder why there are substantially less posts on MOU? > > Don't hear me wrongly, this is not a criticism, more is not necessarily > better. > > At one point I was informed that friendliness & criticism was an issue - but > over the years, having engaged with many members, and having served on the > board, find this is perception more than reality. > > Is it scope of topic? More members? More newcomers? History of rarity & > scientific inquiry, rather than sharing normal observations? > > Either way, enjoy & am thankful for both. > > Al Schirmacher > Princeton, MN > > Sent from my iPhone > ---- > Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net > Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html > > ---- > Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net > Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html > ---- Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html
