Well, what do we have on hand in terms of the attributes? If only one person is responsible, can he/she be tracked down and worked with?
Also, can we control how the documentation appears (i.e., the coding) in the Wikipedia? For example, could we submit it with Javascript that would show how the attributes appear? If we're gonna do it, we might as well kick Microsoft's ass while were at it. I'm a crusty old project manager and writer with a few cycles to spare, so while I have (a relative degree of) aptitude, I'm not familiar with the niceties of execution. Thanks, Bob --- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Never seen MozRef before. Still lacking a bit of > documentation, but it > is only done by one person. If Mozilla documentation > is to be of the > same standard as Internet Explore, then a dedicated > team is really > needed. > > Generally (always?) open source documentation is not > as good as > commercial software documentation as not many would > like to do it (for > free) and it can be very tedious to do. > > It is a pity, as browsers like Firefox could be very > successful, but > real funding is probably needed to do that. A > community can only take > you so far (unless members of that community put in > a lot of resources > - i.e. pay people to work full time on > documentation/coding). > > _______________________________________________ > mozilla-documentation mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation > ===== Bob Nisonger 60 Wallace Street Red Bank, NJ 07701 (732) 212-2991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
