fantasai wrote: > If you scroll down a bit past the <head>, you'll see that it is really > just the content. The navigational stuff is added later. However, we > use full HTML files for the source -- this lets you add links to style > sheets, edit the title and DOCTYPE appropriately, and view/validate the > document before you submit it. Didn't really notice that. So assume it is processed/approved before being committed - then use Regular Expression / Perl to insert it into the site template? Or is it all done manually (cut and paste)? > Anne has done some work on documenting CSS properties. It should be ready > to go up on developer.mozilla.org pretty soon. :) > See bug 281960: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281960 That's good work, I'm sure many will find it of use. While linking to the W3C specs is important, perhaps an intermediate page may be better? Quirks and code samples as well as differences between rendering in quirks and standards compliant modes could go on that page. I noticed the bug was filed soon after my initial post (coincidence?).
_______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
