Its not a matter of being lazy. It takes no more or less time to bottom 
or top post.

All you have to do is choose to set for one or the other.  Top posting
is just more logical. The thread flows better.

jesus X wrote:
> 
> Daniel Veditz wrote:
> > The "official" rule around here (http://www.mozilla.org/community.html)
> >   Edit your followups.
> [snip]
> > "Top posters" tend to ignore that guideline
> 
> Of course. The entire habit of top posting came from people being so lazy that
> not only are they not willing to edit what they are replying to, but they are
> too lazy to just not quote at all (thus leaving the reader to bring up past
> messages to understand context].
> 
> But still, it's another Holy War, and most assuredly not on topic anywhere in
> this tree. Maybe comp.usenet.lazy.bastards might be more appropriate. :)
> 
> --
> jesus X  [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
>  email   [ jesusx @ who.net ]
>  web     [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
>  tag     [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
>  warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET     |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street        |Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to