On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Gervase Markham wrote: >> >> No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches >> from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to >> 6.x are added/refined, etc. > > That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source > releases (at the same time it makes binary releases) of all the files in > Netscape 6.x under the MPL or NPL or another open source license. And they do. Read the Netscape 6.x license for more details. -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--' +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \ irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1... Jay Garcia
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1... Gervase Markham
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscap... JTK
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... DeMoN_LaG
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... jesus X
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... Gervase Markham
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... JTK
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... W.
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... jesus X
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscap... Ian Hickson
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscap... jesus X
- Re: Is it better to replace Net... Gervase Markham
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mo... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Is it better to replace Netscape 6.1 PR1 with Mozilla... Bren..