Tim Wunder wrote: > jukola wrote: > >> Patrick Gallagher wrote: >> >>> jukola wrote: >>> >>>> Christian Biesinger wrote: >>>> >>>>> ado beith wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as >>>>>> soon as I load the browser up >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did you get a "Talkback Window", asking you to send in crash >>>>> information? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Why would anyone send in "Talkback Information"? >>>> >>>> This "talkback" does not only send the information about what >>>> happened just before the crash but also detailed information about >>>> your computer and what's connected to it. >>>> >>>> Even if you unclick the unneccesary parts of the "talkback" >>>> information this "customised" version of "talkback" is not stored >>>> but you have to do it each and every time you send "talkback" >>>> information. "Talkback" is talking back.... >>>> >>>> I have abolished "talkback" long ago. It's a "NO" each and every >>>> time a crash has happened and the question whether or not to send a >>>> "talkback" is presented. >>>> >>> IF you're not willing to offer information about crashes to help >>> build moz into a great and stable platform, why would you run it? The >>> main purpose of using moz is (supposed to be) testing, and providing >>> feedback that can assist in the development process - this is why the >>> binaries are provided int he first place, isn't it? >>> >> >> I'm more than willing to offer information about crashes contributed >> to Mozilla. >> >> I'm though not willing to give away detailed information about my >> present computer; type of processor, speed, the software I'm using, >> what printer I have etc. and so on. This has nothing to do with the >> behaviour of Mozilla during crashes. Mozilla is a software, "talkback" >> should not be concerned about what printer I'm using, only of it's own >> drawbacks. >> > > Then why install a talkback enabled build? I thought the difference > between "mozilla-win32.zip" and "mozilla-win32-talkback.zip" was that > one was talkback enabled while the other wasn't. Of course, just because > I *think* it doesn't make it true... >
Can you please give a the site for the "non-talkback-enabled site". Quote from Moxilla org: Try these Talkback enabled builds which transmit information about your crashes to a database where engineers can discover the most common crashes and fix them. Send a report for each crash you find during normal everyday use. Talkback is an easy way to report bugs and for a change, filing duplicate reports is good! Microsoft Windows (95,98,ME,NT,2000,XP) MacOS 8.5 - 9.x x86 Linux or, Win32 talkback enabled Full Installer .exe (9.8 MB) for reporting crash data. talkback enabled Zipfile (10.6 MB) (9.8 MB) If you don't understand what the other Win32 builds are, then get this build. end quote. Where do I find the non-talkback-installers? -- jukola
