There are so many things I disagree with about this idea that it's tough
to know where to start :-)

Firstly, this automatically assumes that end-user experience is the
defining criteria for Mozilla 1.0. This is by no means a given. 

Secondly, it assumes that you can find some company willing to let us use
its employees as guinea pigs.

Thirdly, it's extremely arbitrary, as you yourself said. What if the
percentage sticks at 49%? Do we keep working for another six months until
we persuade one more person to switch?

I understand that we need to flag and fix usability issues, and I believe
that they are getting flagged, at least, using mechanisms like nsCatFood.
But I don't believe that usability studies should define the Mozilla
release schedule.

Gerv



Reply via email to