Greg Miller wrote: > > This would require finding someone to fund such a study. It also sets a > very high standard. > ... > Certainly not. In fact, almost nobody downloads and installs browsers. > If we're counting on them to do that, Mozilla will be lucky to ever > crack 10% marketshare no matter how good it is or what its reputation is > like. ISPs and OS vendors decide what browsers people use. Because of those reasons, we could drop the requirements and make it a stop criteria, i.e. we don't release if 10% of users don't switch. This would at least ensure some consumer feedback. Also, since one of Mozilla's strength's is it's cross-platform nature which cannot be really compared with the market leader, maybe we should increase the test to other platforms and see if we can how many people we can get to switch. Vineet -- ---------------------------------------------------> Vineet Sinha ------------> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------> UW Comp. Eng. Class of 2001 -------->
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Josh Soref
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Scott I. Remick
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
