On Wednesday 08 June 2005 16:38, Mike Shaver wrote: > Ian G wrote: > > Petname hasn't to my knowledge any testing done > > in a proper sense on naive users. Trustbar has, > > and it shares the same roots in security theory. The > > results were positive, although the tests were done > > in small numbers. If testing were needed to go further > > then this would be a good point to consider. > > I can't find the trustbar results, though I'll confess I only searched > for a few minutes. Can you point me at them? I'm quite interested in > reading them, and I suspect others here are as well.
Sure, the working reports is here: http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~herzbea/Papers/ecommerce/spoofing.htm Section 5 is their "tests" and 5.2 is how they presented mock ups and watched for reactions. As always, it's no more than a start. iang -- Advances in Financial Cryptography: https://www.financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000458.html _______________________________________________ Mozilla-security mailing list Mozilla-security@mozilla.org http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
