Shawn Riley wrote: > > Hi. I have a couple of my own questions about this. > > It sounds like what's being referred to as "ABR" would be not only faster, > but more reliable (in quality terms) than the traditional VBR. So what's > the use of traditional VBR now? >From the previous postings, it turns that ABR is not a true variable bit rate >encoding. It is a compromise between constant bit rate and variable bit rate. So true VBR is still justified because *it is* true VBR, even if it is not perfect at the moment (because of GPSYCHO imperfections). By the way: how is implemented VBR in ogg Vorbis? Does it look like lame's VBR, ABR, or something else ? Pierre -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Ivo
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Zia Mazhar
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Scott Manley
- [MP3 ENCODER] Wither MP3 ? Eric.Howgate
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Wither MP3 ? Erik de Castro Lopo
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Ross Levis
- [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questions Leonardo Stern
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questions Ivo
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questions Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questio... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questio... Pierre Hugonnet
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questio... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] General ABR questio... Pierre Hugonnet
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Christian Schepke
- [MP3 ENCODER] dist10-code Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] About Vorbis Monty