Hello Rob,

Friday, August 18, 2000, 4:07:52 AM, you wrote:

>> RL> If you can point me to a specific implementation I can try to test it
>> RL> directly. The only requirement I have is that the implementation support
>> RL> some way of saving the decoded output to a file (e.g. WAV).
>> 
>> Would be great: http://www.daansystems.com/coolplayer

RL> I tested CoolPlayer and added it to the list of results:
RL>   http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/compliance/

thanks, I'll have a look right now...

RL> One thing to consider is that the compliance test data only sweeps frequencies
RL> up to 10kHz, so unfortunately any bizarre behavior above this would not be
RL> detected.

did you know I am a person that cares about the 16-22kHz region? :)

I'm thinking the "sharp edges" I hear in some songs situate themselves above the
>10kHz region.  It is a problem because I consider something sounding
like that "artifacted", but when I listen to the wav on the same
computer, it sounds much softer.  That's why I concluded it sounded
off.

>> maybe to be sure you can capture the output with totalrecorder.  This
>> way you can also assure that the output is the same as the .wav
>> writer.

RL> What is totalrecorder?

a real fine product. captures all audio sent to the soundcard
digitally by pretending it is one.  Can be used to record any of those
protected and encrypted formats.  I used this to do some wma tests.

http://www.totalrecorder.com/

-- 
Best regards,
 Roel                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to