************************************************************************
***  WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING  ***
************************************************************************
*
*      The e-mail-message appended below is list- or mailserver-related
*
*   That type of mail will by definition not be processed on this system
*         and in general is not accepted in the fidonet.org-domain.
*
*      To avoid these bouncings the listkeeper is kindly requested to
*   remove any subscription coming from a z2.fidonet.org-style address.
*
*    If you have reason to believe your message was removed without due
*     reason then kindly inform '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
*
************************************************************************

    From:  Eric Howgate @2:292/862
    To:    Sergey Sapelin @2:5020/1844.33
    Subj.: Re: Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] RazorLame 1.1.0 released
    Dated: 03 Sep 00  18:50:45
    [processed here:  05 Sep 00 14:16:38]

@TOPT 33
@INTL 2:5020/1844 2:292/862
@MSGID: home ac3fa0b7
@REPLYADDR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@REPLYTO: 2:292/862@fidonet UUCP
@PID: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
@CHRS: LATIN-1 2
@RFC-Received: from geek.rcc.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.15.234.212])
        by infomag.iguana.be (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA25434       for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 19:17:31 +0200
@RFC-Received: (from majordom@localhost) by geek.rcc.se (8.8.4/8.7.3) id
SAA04299 for mp3encoder-list; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:54:42 +0200
@RFC-X-Authentication-Warning: geek.rcc.se: majordom set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
@RFC-Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com (tungsten.btinternet.com
[194.73.73.81]) by geek.rcc.se (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA04296 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:54:40 +0200
@RFC-Received: from [213.1.66.203] (helo=home)  by tungsten.btinternet.com with
smtp (Exim 3.03 #83)    id 13Vd5y-0004vK-00     for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 03
Sep 2000 17:58:14 +0100
@RFC-Message-ID: <003001c015c8$64d1fde0$cb4201d5@home>
@RFC-References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@RFC-X-Priority: 3
@RFC-X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
@RFC-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Eric Howgate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: Holger Dors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roel VdB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 12:01 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] RazorLame 1.1.0 released


> Hello Roel,
>
> > 30 options in 1 screen are less complicated than 30 options scattered
> > over 5 screens.
> This can probably be disputed for very long!
>
>
> > - 1 screen (oversight & clarity)
> > - in top, a (greyed out or so) continuous display of current command
> > line.  I never understood why enabling this is an option.
> > - only a limited set of "core" options. stereo mode, bitrate, encoder
> > mode, delete after, and the most common flags.  Just so you have a nice
oversight of
> > options.
> > - a box to add non-common command line options.
> > - a flag to make lame only use that box, instead of adding the content
> > to current selected options.
> The problem starts with the "most common flags". Who will define
> those? You've left out VBR, for a start. Similar, I know at least one
> person who was very happy about that the "Audio Processing" tab where
> you can set sampling frequency and filter options.
>
> Personally, I started RL because of the many options Lame has to
> offer, it's fun to play with them, and I wanted an easy interface. I
> admit that the options dialog is far from being perfect, but I think
> it's a good start.
>
>
> > then, why no multithread? it'd be nice to update the to-be-encoded
> > list in one window while the encoding-box is somewhere else...
> Actually, this is on my wish list. However, unlike LAME, I'm currently
> the only programmer in RazorLame (I hope this changes soon!), and the
> wishlist grows and grows. Additional, I do this in my spare time, so
> please be patient.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>   Holger Dors                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Perhaps the 'disputants' might care to take a look at a new front end for
Lame, available from
http://www.geocities.com/enlamer/

This has many of Lame's options in the one large user dialog, but I suspect
it will confuse the novice user (and it seems to be able to handle only
single files at present);  perhaps it is time for someone who fully
understands all the options/switches to settle down and write a
comprehensive  'Help' file for Lame, - I doubt many who use Lame with a
front-end or ripping utility bother to read the 'Usage' file that
accompanies the exe file and I don't think users of the dll file even see
it.

Roel's site is certainly a good guide for achieving optimal performance with
music - but there are other uses, eg voice recording, not touched on there,
and only barely mentioned in the 'Usage'  file.

Eric







--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
@Via ifmail 2:292/862@fidonet, Sun Sep 3 2000 at 19:17 (2.14-tx8.10)

@Via D'Bridge 1.58 2:292/854  09/05 14:08

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to