On Friday 27 February 2009 23:30:09 Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> 
wrote:
> > As far as we know MPIR 0.9.0 is highly stable and correct, so you
> > shouldn't have any issues using it in production code. It is used in
> > Sage for example, which has thousands of users. So far there have been
> > no reported issues (except build issues on strange hardware, which you
> > obviously haven't had).
>
> Good to hear that, I'm switching things over now.  These extra
> speedups are going to save me *days* of computing time in the long
> run.  For my real-word apps I'm seeing a 1.3x speedup with MPIR 0.9 on
> 64bit AMD vs GMP 4.2.4 and between 1.2x and 1.7x speedup on 64bit
> Core2.
>
> The squaring code with 105000 digit integers:
> AMD Opteron 248 @ 2.2GHz (Linux 64bit)
> MPIR 0.9 = 83m11.177s
> GMP 4.2.4 = 108m41.370s
>
> Intel Xeon E5405 @ 2.00GHz (Linux 64bit)
> MPIR 0.9 = 121m20.354s
> GMP 4.2.4 = 208m40.348s
>
>
> Using GMP-ECM to ECM a 244 digit number with B1=11e6:
> AMD Opteron 248 @ 2.2GHz (Linux 64bit)
> MPIR 0.9  = 2m32.406s
> GMP 4.2.4 = 3m20.908s
>
> Intel Xeon E5405 @ 2.00GHz (Linux 64bit)
> MPIR 0.9 = 3m45.447s
> GMP 4.2.4 =  4m40.356s
>
> So thanks for all your hard work!  With all the Core2 Windows stuff
> happening after 0.9.0 I will probably wait until 1.0 to test out my
> Windows binaries.
>
> Jeff.
>
> 

This could make a nice "real world" benchmark for MPIR , where we have cache 
misses and branch mispredictions. The current mpirbench and speed don't have 
these features. For example if we pipeline the entire mul_basecase to 
increase the speed , it turns out to be 1.5x larger in the code cache. Now 
speed and mpirbench would probably not show any indication of this, whereas 
in the real world it may be a slowdown.
I suppose we also have want two types of real world benchmark , one that stays 
the same and one that evolves along with MPIR.
For example an ECM which uses mpz_mod full stop, and another one which uses 
mpz_mod and later on when MPIR gets mpz_mod_constant_divisor it uses that.

Jason


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to