On Mar 5, 1:56 pm, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I noted that the new version of your script still emits ASM_START. You
> could have it emit BITS 64 instead if you like, or just omit it
> altogether.
Good idea - I need BITS 64 as well.
>
> Also, when I said that the function can just end with ret, I didn't
> mean that it should emit ret instead of asm_windows_blah or whatever
> it was. There is already a ret at the end of the function. I simply
> meant that you don't have to put anything at all at the end of the
> code, i.e. instead of the last ret you are currently emiting, you can
> just emit nothing.
Ok, I misunderstood what you wanted - its easy to change.
> The rest looks OK I think.
Great!
Brian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
