On Wednesday 22 April 2009 16:08:28 Jeff Gilchrist wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Thanks. I will add that now. > > > > We should be able to expand our list of machines for regular testing > > later today. I've sent out some emails and expect to expand the list > > quite a bit - though surely this will lead to new test failures. > > I also have a Pentium D you can list for cygwin. Right now configure > shows it as a "pentium4-pc-cygwin". I don't think there is anything > special about Pentium D's just they are dual-core so I'm assuming that > is the right detection? > > Jeff. >
The names we chose for the x86_64 microarchitecture dont always correspond to the marketing names used , which can be a bit confusing. Intel is our main culprit here :) core2 is 65nm core2 penryn is 45nm core2 with the extra sse instructions plus reduced latencys on a few instructions. We havent changed any of the x86 names except for athlon to k7 , so your pentium4 looks right Jason > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
