Oooh. That looks good! Great work Jason.
On 20 February 2011 13:35, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:52:10 Jason wrote: >> On Tuesday 15 February 2011 17:03:24 Jason wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > A new mpn_mod_1_1 for the nehalem/westmere , previously ran at 12.5c/l >> > now runs at 12c/l which is optimal (for the chosen method). >> > >> > This was running faster on the core2/penryn , but not since I did the >> > feed-in >> > >> > :( >> > >> > Jason >> >> New mpn_mod_1_1 for Core2 and another slightly different one for Penryn. >> The old code ran at 14.3c/l and the the new code's run at 13c/l and >> 13.3c/l >> >> Jason > > A new AMD mpn_mod_1_2 used to run at 4.0c/l now runs at 3.5c/l which is > optimal. > > Brian , for the windows conversions note that for all the different cpus , > mod_1_1's and mod_1_2 etc are all minor re-arrangements of each other. > > I've adapted my search program to accept prologue and epilogue code to the > loops, this helped find the code above , hopefully it will help the Intel > chips > as well as they suffer much more from this problem. > > Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
