On Wednesday 13 July 2011 14:01:39 Cactus wrote: > Darn, I already did the conversion :-( > > I don't have enough registers to use only the 32-bit registers so I have to > put stuff in r8 and r9 instead. Given this involved prefix opcodes, I am > wondering what I should o with your coded nops since any alignment you are > seeking won't be the same with r8 and r9? ANy ideas on how to optimise > this when r8 and r9 are used instead of rsi and rdx? >
The nop's in the loop are for the schedulers/pick I believe , not for code alignment. So it shouldn't matter. If it does then you could try moving the nop's around , or as only two registers are used in the loop just swap them around in the feedin code. See next post on alternative. > Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
