On Sunday 20 February 2011 17:24:40 Bill Hart wrote:
> Oooh. That looks good!
> 
> Great work Jason.
> 
> On 20 February 2011 13:35, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:52:10 Jason wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 15 February 2011 17:03:24 Jason wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> > 
> >> > A new mpn_mod_1_1 for the nehalem/westmere , previously ran at 12.5c/l
> >> > now runs at 12c/l which is optimal (for the chosen method).
> >> > 
> >> > This was running faster on the core2/penryn , but not since I did the
> >> > feed-in
> >> > 
> >> > :(
> >> > 
> >> > Jason
> >> 
> >> New mpn_mod_1_1 for Core2 and another slightly different one for Penryn.
> >> The old code ran at 14.3c/l and the the new code's run at 13c/l and
> >> 13.3c/l
> >> 
> >> Jason
> > 
> > A new AMD mpn_mod_1_2 used to run at 4.0c/l now runs at 3.5c/l which is
> > optimal.
> > 
> > Brian , for the windows conversions note that for all the different cpus
> > , mod_1_1's and mod_1_2 etc are all minor re-arrangements of each other.
> > 
> > I've adapted my search program to accept prologue and epilogue code to
> > the loops, this helped find the code above , hopefully it will help the
> > Intel chips as well as they suffer much more from this problem.
> > 
> > Jason
> > 
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
> > mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email
> > to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this
> > group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

A new mpn_mod_1_2 for Core2/Penryn (only one version this time) , used to run 
at 7.9c/l now runs at 6.2c/l (6.0c/l is optimal)

Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to