On Friday 20 January 2012 02:43:11 jason wrote:
> 
> On Jan 20, 1:07 am, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 January 2012 09:42:35 Jason wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday 19 January 2012 09:32:02 Cactus wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the testing.  You are right - the t-locale.c test failure is 
> > > > not
> > > > a major concern.
> >
> > > > Has anyone tested a Linux build for the mpir-exp branch?
> >
> > > This will need some configure work done first , I was just waiting for it 
> > > to settle done a bit , I should have the time tonight
> >
> > > >     Brian
> >
> > done it except for the new fft tuning . I had to change a minor bit about 
> > ULLONG_MAX in tests/t-constants.c as I dont think unix has these or if 
> > configure supports them , I'll check
> 
> Tried running the stand alone fft-tune with FLINT_BITS=64 and even
> with 3GB and swap space I cant tune the second param
> 
> /* fft_tuning.h -- autogenerated by tune-fft */
> 
> #ifndef FFT_TUNING_H
> #define FFT_TUNING_H
> 
> #include "mpir.h"
> 
> #define FFT_TAB \
>    { { 4, 3 }, { 4, 3 }, { 3, 2 }, { 2, 1 }, { 2, 1 } }
> 
> #define MULMOD_TAB \
>    { Segmentation fault
> 
> It clearly uses too much memory
> 
> Jason
> 
> 

compiling mpir with --enable-assert we get this straight away

/* fft_tuning.h -- autogenerated by tune-fft */

#ifndef FFT_TUNING_H
#define FFT_TUNING_H

#include "mpir.h"

#define FFT_TAB \
   { { mulmod_2expp1_basecase.c:51: GNU MP assertion failed: !((xp) + (n) > 
(yp) && (yp) + (n) > (xp))
Aborted


which is a partial overlap of src and dst in the function


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to