On Friday 20 January 2012 02:43:11 jason wrote: > > On Jan 20, 1:07 am, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 19 January 2012 09:42:35 Jason wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 19 January 2012 09:32:02 Cactus wrote: > > > > Thanks for the testing. You are right - the t-locale.c test failure is > > > > not > > > > a major concern. > > > > > > Has anyone tested a Linux build for the mpir-exp branch? > > > > > This will need some configure work done first , I was just waiting for it > > > to settle done a bit , I should have the time tonight > > > > > > Brian > > > > done it except for the new fft tuning . I had to change a minor bit about > > ULLONG_MAX in tests/t-constants.c as I dont think unix has these or if > > configure supports them , I'll check > > Tried running the stand alone fft-tune with FLINT_BITS=64 and even > with 3GB and swap space I cant tune the second param > > /* fft_tuning.h -- autogenerated by tune-fft */ > > #ifndef FFT_TUNING_H > #define FFT_TUNING_H > > #include "mpir.h" > > #define FFT_TAB \ > { { 4, 3 }, { 4, 3 }, { 3, 2 }, { 2, 1 }, { 2, 1 } } > > #define MULMOD_TAB \ > { Segmentation fault > > It clearly uses too much memory > > Jason > >
compiling mpir with --enable-assert we get this straight away /* fft_tuning.h -- autogenerated by tune-fft */ #ifndef FFT_TUNING_H #define FFT_TUNING_H #include "mpir.h" #define FFT_TAB \ { { mulmod_2expp1_basecase.c:51: GNU MP assertion failed: !((xp) + (n) > (yp) && (yp) + (n) > (xp)) Aborted which is a partial overlap of src and dst in the function -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.