Yeah, I've just done it now. Bill.
On 12 October 2012 20:23, Brian Gladman <b...@gladman.plus.com> wrote: > -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hart > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:18 PM > To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] MPIR 2.6.0 alpha1 released > > I think we should test if LLONG_MAX is defined. This actually doesn't > tell us if long long exists, but tells us if long long exists AND the > system long long's are fully c99 compliant. > > Then if LLONG_MAX is not defined but MAXINT_MAX is defined and not > equal to LONG_MAX, then we should define maxint_t function. > > I'll try this and see if it works. I think this is what is causing the > bug on the ia64 machine with gcc 4.1.2. > > =================== > > So all the HAVE_LONG_LONG in mpirxx.h need to be changed to test for > LLONG_MAX? > > Brian > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
