On 16 August 2015 at 17:07, <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Le vendredi 14 août 2015 19:36:55 UTC+2, Bill Hart a écrit : >> >> I appreciate the gesture, but it's better to contribute this to the >> official GMP project. The reason is that it is in their namespace. If they >> add a similar function later, it may end up with a different name, or worse >> still, same name, different semantics! >> >> > All right, I did a patch for GMP and submit it through the mailing list > gmp-devel (including the suggestion of Frederik)... will see. > > That being said, it seems that they no longer use direct access to > attributes but rather macro > x->_mp_d for x an mpz_t is now PTR() > x->_mp_num for x an mpq_t is now NUM() > x->_mp_den for x an mpq_t is now DEN() > I found many of the old version in the mpir comparison code compared to > their. >
Yes, we haven't had need to change many in MPIR. Obviously the GMP approach is more future proof. Bill. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
