> >since we seem to agree on many things. The only difference is: I want a new > >MSX, you want a faster MSX. > > > And you seem to be the only one around here ;-) Are there some more ?? Wouldn't it be nice to have both? I'd like a new MSX that has new capabilities but is also compatible AND fast when running 'old' software. It sounds like I'll have to buy both a Z180 and a Z380 board... Pierre **** MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in the body (not the subject) of the message. Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] More information on MSX can be found in the following places: The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/ The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet ****
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE 002 and A... Eric . Boon
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE 002 ... Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE 002 ... Siebe Berveling
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE ... Laurens Holst
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE ... Daniel Jorge Caetano
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE ... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE 002 ... Siebe Berveling
- Zx80 compatibility Pierre Gielen
- Zx80 compatibility Patriek Lesparre
- Re: Zx80 compatibility Daniel Jorge Caetano
- Re: Zx80 compatibility Laurens Holst
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE 002 ... Siebe Berveling
- Re: Z180 vs Z380 (was Re: ACE ... Ricardo Bittencourt Vidigal Leitao
- ACE002, Z180, (LPE) Z380, ... Laurens Holst
- Re: ACE002, Z180, (LPE... Daniel Jorge Caetano
- Re: ACE002, Z180,... Laurens Holst
- Re: ACE002, Z... Daniel Jorge Caetano
- Re: ACE00... Laurens Holst