On Sat, 22 Apr 2000 22:06:30 +0200, Laurens Holst wrote:

>> However for Z180/Z380, LDIR will probably be faster and ADVRAM can be
>> useful.
>But it will
>1. be incompatible with previous MSX models,
>2. require a lot of processor-speed,
>3. need additional circuitry = extra cost,
>4. be a better solution to use the Gfx9000 if you really need speed.

  Once GFX9000 is also accessed by OUTs, it's a good guess that
ADVRAM will be faster. Also, ADVRAM will be CHEAPER than GFX9000...
And also, you'll have not to connect the monitor to one cartridge
to see the image, since the ADVRAM is enabled/disbled via software
and uses the same exit as VDP.
  But ADVRAM requires internal modifications, which are not needed
on GFX9000.

>Okay, now I come to think of it, I admit it will also be very useful to
>display 3D rendered stuff. Okay, leave it in, it's a good idea.

  Yes! (-; No only 3D... videos also.



     AbraçOS/2, Daniel Caetano ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

...!m.tag
OS/2 Sites:     http://www.quasarbbs.com/daniel/
                http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/8752/os2hp/os2index.html
MSX Sites:      http://www.fudeba.cjb.net/
Drawings:       http://www.djgallery.tsx.org/



****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****

Reply via email to