On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:21:18 +0200 Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at the code, and I am very confused. can you help me? > > 1.) why four bytes? all msc_* funcions only use the first two bytes > anyway, so passing more looks wrong to me. also I'm not sure > which if any functions in card-muscle or the muscle filesystem use > more than this. so why four bytes? 4 bytes = size of muscle card object ID file-> 2 byte dir, 2 byte file dir -> 2 bytes only > 2.) why int and u8[4] mix? why not keep only one? less converting, > should be easier. or maybe best use two bytes where only two are > looked at anyway, and more where more is actualy used? Keeping the u8[4] seems to be the best and simplest route. int was used to keep data passing simple (I was re-aquanting myself with C at the time). > 3.) why not sc_path? I hadn't really looked at sc_path (until just now)... it looks like it could potentially work... just have muscle_filesystem convert them to the object-ids as necessary. -- Thomas Harning Jr. _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list Muscle@lists.musclecard.com http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
