funny, my built in translator translates back to german, when typing in
english, so:
What has always bothered me regarding audio: Is that really without of a
relevant influence on the audible? Practically, one steals information,
respectively overwrites them and thereby assuming that some additional
noise does no harm to it. If one follows the logic, one could restrict
the audio area in general and work with Internet audio from 1995 (64kb
MP3) again. :-)
j
Am 20.11.2021 um 09:35 schrieb Sound of L.A. Music and Audio:
Interesting subject - appears to be similar to the "buried" information
within noise, intruduced into data channels in air borne applications to
invisibly transport codes for identification.
Was mich hinsichtlich Audio immer beschäftigt hat:
Ist das wirklich ohne relevanten Einfluss auf das Hörbare?
Praktisch klaut man ja Informationsanteile, bzw. überschreibt sie und
unterstellt dabei frech, dass ein bisschen zusätzliches Rauschen keinen
Schaden anrichtet.
?
Am 20.11.2021 um 03:34 schrieb robert bristow-johnson:
Sampo, you should look into this buried data method of creating dither
that is subtractable.
The late Michael Gerzon https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=7964 .
I can get a copy for you, just email me.
--
r b-j . _ . _ . _ . _ [email protected]
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
.
.
.
