These PicoScopes look pretty cool :]

As it happens I am just now trying to free up some garage space to get an
electronics bench together. But it's coming up on 20 years since I last
soldered and it's a whole different world with scopes now. So thanks for
this thread!

Also if anybody knows good resources for refurbishing old receivers and
speakers please point me in that direction.

E

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Andrew Simper <a...@cytomic.com> wrote:

> Hi Remy,
>
> I use the signal generator all the time to calibrate the pot on the
> probes when in x10 mode using the square wave output. Note that the
> scope runs off USB power so you can't generate very hot signals, it's
> +- 2V (USB is 5V), you'll need to make your own external booster
> circuit for general use. The 5000 has a proper analog signal generator
> from what I can tell, and the 5000B adds a 14-bit sample based
> arbitrary waveform generator that runs at 200MHz, so absolutely fine
> for any audio applications, but for us audio guys we have soundcards
> to play back waveforms, so it's not that much use.
>
> I wish they made this scope when I bought my first one, I bought the
> 12bit 4226 model, which still works great, but I would love this new
> one!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 07:19, Remy Muller <muller.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > AudioPrecision looks nice but it's way over my budget considering that it
> > won't be used on a daily basis.
> >
> > Looking at the specs, the QuantAsylum audio card only seems to have AC
> > coupling (down to 1.6Hz) and their oscillosccope page is a bit short on
> > details.
> >
> > Hacking a soundcard as an oscilloscope could be very convenient since it
> > benefits from all the standard audio softwares and can easily get beyong
> the
> > 2/4 channels, but it's limited to AC coupling, unless there are
> soundcards
> > that have DC coupled inputs? AFAIK most only provide DC outputs.
> > Furthermore having to do homemade matched probes and attenuators is not
> very
> > 'plug and play'.
> >
> > Since bitscope seems to only provide 8-bit ADC, Picoscope is thus very
> high
> > on my list, in particular the 5000 series. I'm wondering whether their
> > Arbitrary Waveform Generator option is really worth it though.
> >
> > @Andrew I just found a python wrapper based on ctypes
> > https://github.com/colinoflynn/pico-python
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback!
> >
> >
> > On 08/03/17 12:16, Roshan Wijetunge wrote:
> >
> > Depending on how cheap and improvised you want to go, and how handy you
> are
> > with basic electronics, you can easily adapt your soundcard to work as an
> > oscilloscope. There are a number of guides on the internet on how to do
> > this, such as:
> >
> > http://makezine.com/projects/sound-card-oscilloscope/
> >
> > I have used the following variation with good results:
> >
> > - Probe via resistor to mic input of mixer
> > - Mixer line out to line of USB soundcard
> > - Schwa Schope plugin running in any DAW host (e.g. Reaper)
> >
> > I used this setup as it utilised components I already had available, and
> it
> > has proved very useful for debugging audio hardware, being able to trace
> > signals through a circuit as well as biasing amplifier stages in
> pre-amps.
> > Using the mixer gave me control over input signal range though clearly
> you
> > have to be careful with gain staging so as not to introduce distortion to
> > the signal.
> >
> > I also improvised a signal generator using a Electro Harmonix Tube Zipper
> > guitar effects pedal. It's an auto-wah type pedal, but you can set the
> > resonance to maximum, sensitivity to zero and it generates a nice clean
> > stable sine wave.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Roshan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8 March 2017 at 09:57, Andrew Simper <a...@cytomic.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Picoscope make the cheapest 16-bit scopes around (USD 1000), the
> >> 16-bit stuff from Tektronix is a lot more expensive (USD 31000 -
> >> that's right I didn't accidentally add an extra zero, it's x30 the
> >> price). I would recommend using the Picoscope and use Python's easy c
> >> bindings to call the Picoscope library functions to do what you want.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> On 7 March 2017 at 22:59, Remy Muller <muller.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to invest into an USB oscilloscope.
> >> >
> >> > The main purpose is in analog data acquisition and instrumentation.
> >> > Since
> >> > the main purpose is audio, bandwidth is not really an issue, most
> models
> >> > seem to provide 20MHz or much more and I'm mostly interested in analog
> >> > inputs, not logical ones.
> >> >
> >> > Ideally I'd like to have
> >> >
> >> >  - Mac, Windows and Linux support
> >> >
> >> > - 4 channels or more
> >> >
> >> > - 16-bit ADC
> >> >
> >> > - up to 20V
> >> >
> >> > - general purpose output generator*
> >> >
> >> > - a scripting API (python preferred)
> >> >
> >> > * I have been told that most oscilloscopes have either no or limited
> >> > output,
> >> > and that I'd rather use a soundcard for generating dedicated test
> audio
> >> > signals, synchronizing the oscilloscope acquisition using the
> >> > soundcard's
> >> > word-clock. However not having to deal with multiple drivers and clock
> >> > synchronization would be more than welcome.
> >> >
> >> > A friend of mine recommended using Picoscope which seems well
> supported,
> >> > has
> >> > a strong user community but no official support for python AFAIK.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > https://www.picotech.com/oscilloscope/5000/flexible-
> resolution-oscilloscope
> >> >
> >> > I also found about bitscope http://www.bitscope.com which looks more
> >> > oriented toward the casual hacker/maker, seems more open-ended and has
> >> > python support, much cheaper too.
> >> >
> >> > What about the traditional oscilloscope companies like Tektronix,
> Rigol
> >> > ?
> >> >
> >> > Has anyone experience with any of those? or any other reference to
> >> > recommend?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
> >> > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> >> > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
> >> music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> >> https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
> > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
> > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
> _______________________________________________
> dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
> music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
> https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
>
>
_______________________________________________
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp

Reply via email to