On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Don Redman wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:50:09 +0200, Steve Wyles wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Robert Kaye wrote:
I did not mean to circumvent the process here -- I do apologize.
Please advise if I should:
1. reset the four artists to unknown and remove the project type from the
live server or
2. don't sweat it and call it a done deal or
3. Have the RFV now and if a veto appears, I will do #1.
Was the impact on the libraries, applications and datafeed customers
assessed?
The impact of a sematical change was definetely not assesed. The boundaries
between the new type and other types are not defined. I opt for 1.
I've just checked and there are now 66 artists that have been set to
project and it appears to break the lucene search.
http://musicbrainz.org/search/textsearch.html?query=limelight&type=artist&an=1&as=1&limit=25&handlearguments=1
limelight is one of the artists that has been set to project
http://musicbrainz.org/show/artist/?artistid=31378
I think until the full impact has been assessed, it should be reversed.
Steve (inhouseuk)
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
