On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And, (mainly of application for those of us who do deal with > > bootlegs), I suggest adding one item under when not to merge: > > > > * When two releases are of the same event, but are from different > > master recordings > > IMO this is already covered by the "different recordings" case... > you're talking about different *recordings* right? > Do you think this really deserves a separate (IMO redundant) note? >
What about mentioning it as an example of different recordings? "*different recordings* (eg: remix, single version, separate masters of the same event, etc)," -- Frederic Da Vitoria
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
