2011/8/2, Lukáš Lalinský <lalin...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:03 AM, jesus2099 <hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org> > wrote: >> X>>> « 3) Some other editor fixes the recordings, which adds even more >> work >> for voters. » >> J2>> That’s also true when you enter altered titles and then someone with >> the release has to fix track titles back. >> PCB> I'm not sure I understand the point. >> >> Having unfaithful tracklist to fix is same work load as the opposite that >> is >> described in 3) point. > > But that is precisely my point, having separate guidelines for titles > and recordings means it's more difficult to maintain MusicBrainz.
I disagree: As-printed wouldn't require a difficult guideline, while I am still unsure of the differences between tracks and recordings following your proposal. Because you although your proposal is titled "unify track/recordings", they will end up different at some point. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
