On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <phi...@foolip.org> wrote: >> http://musicbrainz.org/edit/18155855 >> >> In short, I know of at least 3 works where a well-known piece of music >> was "sampled" in a new work: >> >> http://musicbrainz.org/work/faacf69c-a008-47bf-a705-4099219c35af >> http://musicbrainz.org/work/1a5edc0e-a2eb-40b3-92a9-78d15fb536d4 >> http://musicbrainz.org/work/ed1600ee-46f0-4e5d-adc1-03341d515287 >> >> The "version of" work-work AR seems inappropriate, so what to do? > > I don't really see a big issue with listing Beethoven as composer, > although I know monxton and I won't agree on this one.
On second thought I guess that doesn't really solve the issue anyway. I would love more options to link works, including "transcription" for classical and probably something like what you mention - although I'm not too sure how I would call it since I don't think "sampling" is a correct name. >> >> -- >> Philip Jägenstedt >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > > -- > Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
