On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, practik <kronp...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Philip Jägenstedt wrote >> >> "[work] includes [lyrics|music] adapted from [work]" sounds good to >> me, at least it would work in the cases that I have encountered. Are >> you interested in pursuing an RFC/RFV for this? >> > > I am, although I wouldn't be able to get the RFC together until later this > month or early August. If anyone else wanted to take the idea and run with > it before that, I wouldn't mind. I'd also want to check with caller#6 to > see if he had any other thoughts about how this relationship should work, > since it was really his idea. > > Another question to discuss: caller#6 also suggested it would be even > better to have a three-point AR: "[work] includes [lyrics|music] adapted by > [artist] from [work]." I don't believe three-point ARs are currently > possible, but I wonder if we could approximate one by adding an attribute. > It would be analogous to the [instrument] attribute, except you'd pick from > the list of artists instead of the instrument tree. I have no idea whether > that's possible, and I don't think it's an essential feature, but I wanted > to mention it.
I don't think this is possible at the moment - and while 3-point relationships have been requested a few times, I suspect we're still quite far from them. I wouldn't count on them for now. > Patrick > > -- > View this message in context: > http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/Sampling-at-the-composition-work-level-tp4637121p4637191.html > Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
