So it's been established that the translations are indeed "what's on the cover", and we are always on shaky ground when it comes to that because some editors rate that very highly.
Not that I'm bitter or anything, but having been previously outvoted when I objected to an editor changing a track title to "Translated Title/Original Title", their argument being that that was how it was printed on the cover, I know that there are other views out there. To my mind that was a whole lot worse than "Translated Title (Original Title)". I know this is the other way round to Per Starbäck's release, but for a different example, look at http://musicbrainz.org/release/f1057c2e-2981-467e-a581-f2ef2b926a11 . The artwork (watermarked) can be seen at http://www.folklorediscography.org/HNCD-1342.htm. This album of Bulgarian songs was produced by Joe Boyd, essentially for an English-speaking audience, and the cover has titles in Bulgarian with English translations in parens. Does anyone here think that the translations should not be in the track titles? Personally I find them useful when listening to the music. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
