On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:49:23 +0100 Max Kellermann <m...@duempel.org> wrote: > You're free to do so. Good luck with your fork.
I _don't_ want to fork! > What is the disadvantage of a client/server architecture? Why does > that contradict with "p2p mode"? It doesn't contradict. The disadvantage is that you have to set up the extra server for sharing your music. I think for this application a p2p based architecture is better. > Don't implement what you don't need. All of the protocols you > mentioned allow anonymous access. NFS doesn't have authentication (at > least v3; NFSv4 has extensions for authentication). But if it will be integrated in MPD there is no need for a new protocol. > However NFSv4 with file listings and tags in "virtual" file attributes > sounds like a clever solution... there might be more clever solutions > involving HTTP or WebDAV. Maybe, i don't know the internals of NFS. If there is a good solution that already exists i have nothing against it. I don't think HTTP or WebDAV is a clever solution. Why not simply do chunking of files into small segments? And let the client request each single chunk by a defined command in the protocol or something like that? That would be extremely simple. And if it will be integrated into MPD there should not be made a new protocol of course (like i already stated). Greetings, Steffen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
