The message I'm replying to appeared to demonstrate some kind of charset conversion bug with the mutt from CVS and glibc's character set definition files. I'm attempting to reproduce it with this message. The subject line is supposed to be: charset bug? <@> <@> The first <@> is in iso-8859-1, and the second <@> is in iso-8859-15. I observed that the @ in the second <@> was not converted ... Major bug, eh? Edmund
- A hook for a separate compose window? Tom Weckström
- Re: A hook for a separate compose window? Thomas Roessler
- Re: A hook for a separate compose window? J Horacio MG
- Re: charset bug? <@><@> Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: charset bug? <@><@> Thomas Roessler
- Re: charset bug? <@><@... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- iso-8859-15 [Re: charset bug? <@&... J Horacio MG
- Re: A hook for a separate compose window? Tom Weckström
- Re: A hook for a separate compose window... Greg Matheson
