On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 03:35:35PM +0000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS said:
> The message I'm replying to appeared to demonstrate some kind of
> charset conversion bug with the mutt from CVS and glibc's character
> set definition files.
>
> I'm attempting to reproduce it with this message. The subject line is
> supposed to be: charset bug? <@> <@>
>
> The first <@> is in iso-8859-1, and the second <@> is in iso-8859-15.
> I observed that the @ in the second <@> was not converted ...
>
> Major bug, eh?
Sorry, I changed the charsets in my system to iso-8859-15, and tried
them in mutt: set charset="iso-8859-15"
that didn't work, and I forgot to change it back to iso-8859-1.
oh, now it works for ¤ (euro sign) and ¢ (cent sign)... even with set
charset="iso-8859-1"
Does this bother anyone? I read a message from mutt in xfmail and as it
wouldn't recognize iso-8859-1 it would read assume us-ascii.
Bye,
--
Horacio LC_mutt=es_ES
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://carlotha.ciberia.es/mutt/
~ Spain ~ Spanje ~ Spanien
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = F4EE AE5E 2F01 0DB3 62F2 A9F4 AD31 7093 4233 7AE6
