On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:04:42PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: :On 2000-03-10 02:57:41 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote: : :set attribution="Hullo, %F!\n\nI have a comment about\ : your message about \"%s\" on %d.\n\n\ : ----- begin original message -----" :set post_indent_string="----- end original message ----" I was wrong saying that there wasn't a way in Mutt to pass this info onto an external script. I stand corrected. Excuse me while I RTFM. Yet again. :) But setting a separate set of attribute/post_indent_string values for each send-hook could get ugly with the escapes needed for extra quotes. -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: why is mutt better? Lars Hecking
- Re: why is mutt better? David DeSimone
- Re: why is mutt better? J McKitrick
- Re: why is mutt better? Lars Hecking
- Re: why is mutt better? Vincent Lefevre
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- Re: why is mutt better? Bevan Broun
- Re: why is mutt better? Jeremy Blosser
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- Re: why is mutt better? Thomas Roessler
- macros and templates (was: why is mu... Eugene Lee
- macros and templates (was: why is mutt bette... Mark Weinem
- macros and templates (was: why is mutt bette... Mark Weinem
- Re: why is mutt better? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: why is mutt better? Stefan `Sec` Zehl
- Re: why is mutt better? Marius Gedminas
- Re: why is mutt better? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: why is mutt better? Marius Gedminas
- Re: why is mutt better? Vincent Lefevre
- Re: why is mutt better? Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: why is mutt better? Thomas Roessler