On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > 1) create the templates you want, using your editor of choice > 2) create macros that change the value of 'editor' to call a script/etc. > that processes the reply+template and calls your editor, then set 'editor' > back to the default, eg: > > macro index r :set editor=replyscript<enter><reply>:set editor=default<enter> > > With forms of this method the "template" isn't even limited to a text-based > construct, it can really be anything at all. Could you please give an example of such a replyscript? I want to reply with a preformulated standard mail (standard.txt). The editor I use is gnuclient. Regards Mark Weinem
- Re: why is mutt better? J McKitrick
- Re: why is mutt better? Lars Hecking
- Re: why is mutt better? Vincent Lefevre
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- Re: why is mutt better? Bevan Broun
- Re: why is mutt better? Jeremy Blosser
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- Re: why is mutt better? Thomas Roessler
- Re: why is mutt better? Eugene Lee
- macros and templates (was: why is mutt bette... Mark Weinem
- Re: why is mutt better? Mark Weinem
- Re: why is mutt better? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: why is mutt better? Stefan `Sec` Zehl
- Re: why is mutt better? Marius Gedminas
- Re: why is mutt better? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: why is mutt better? Marius Gedminas
- Re: why is mutt better? Vincent Lefevre
- Re: why is mutt better? Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: why is mutt better? Thomas Roessler